Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Freedom then and now March 25th Encyclical By Metropolitan Sotirios


It is a fact accepted by all that a more precious thing than freedom does not exist. A person who is not free suffers. He is oppressed. He is not even considered a human being by those who oppress him.
For which freedom do we speak of? First and foremost, we speak of personal freedom. Of course, we also speak of ethnic freedom. Of religious freedom. Of political freedom.
The person who is truly free is the one who is master of himself. He governs himself and is not controlled by his passions. Whoever is master of himself enjoys all the other victories that come with it.
Ethnic freedom is fundamental. This came to the forefront recently, and not from the beginning. This became a fact when the nations were established.
Religious freedom also became a necessity later on. This took place when religions were founded. When humanity lost faith in God and created these religions When man lost his personal relationship with God.
Political freedom is of utmost importance. You have ethnic freedom; that is, a country has its freedom. But in some cases, you are not free within the political system of one’s country – in other words, the political freedom of the citizen. The nation is not enslaved to other countries, but the citizen is enslaved to the dictator or to the bad ruler.
Man had true freedom when he was created by the hands of the Creator. Unfortunately, he relinquished his freedom for material nourishment. He became a slave to himself. To his passions.
It is a great wonder, but man only has true freedom when he follows the will of God. God has no need of this for Himself. Yet, whenever He thinks of man, He deals with him as a Father for His children, always thinking what is best for them.
With the fall of man, humanity became a slave to himself; to his passions; to his sins. He could not be freed by himself. The Creator came in the Person of Christ. The Only-Begotten Son of God became a man. He took on human flesh to free man. On this day of the Annunciation, the Archangel Gabriel revealed the Will of God the Most-Holy Theotokos and Ever-Virgin Mary. God became man. Christ sacrificed Himself for humanity. He gave humanity its freedom once again. He opened wide the doors of Paradise. From then on, man was able to gain access to Paradise through the proper use of his freedom and could then become a citizen of Paradise forever.
This is what God awaits from us. This will only become a reality, however, if man uses his freedom correctly. If he does not become enslaved to his passions. If, during the course of his life, he does not lose his personal relationship and contact with God.
March 25th, 1821 is a landmark for our national freedom. We lost it on May 29, 1453. We lost it because malevolent people were jealous of us and fought us in war. The enemies were many, two being the most prominent: the Crusaders and the Ottomans. We ourselves were not without blame.
We gained our national freedom during the Revolution of 1821; with the true sacrifices of our forebearers during that time; with the return of our forebearers to true freedom, to the personal relationship with God Himself. They fought and sacrificed themselves for the holy faith of Christ and for the freedom of their Motherland.
Greece today has ethnic freedom. Yet, does every Greek (wherever he or she may be in the world) have religious freedom, political freedom and personal freedom?
            The financial crisis in our homeland Greece proves that the Greek has lost his political, religious and personal freedoms. The experience will become a lesson. When every Greek acquires his personal freedom (that is, freedom from his passions), when all Greeks have their personal freedom, then Greece as a whole will enjoy its freedom and its prosperity.
Let us not try to put all the blame on others. Of course, enemies exist. They not only exist, but they also lurk around us. They lurk around us to see us lose our personal freedom, so they may seize away from us every freedom. The greatest responsibility, though, is borne by us. And when we have our national freedom and we waste it away, we bear all the responsibility.
As we celebrate March 25th this year as a religious and national holiday, I call upon all of us to mend our ways; to clearly understand the blessings of freedom that I mentioned above; to compare the freedom that we had when we were not slaves to our passions - the freedom and the joy we had before we lost our national freedom. Let us celebrate, because we have our national freedom. Let us be vigilant to retain our religious freedom, our political freedom, our personal freedom and may we never lose our ethnic freedom.
We who live in Canada have ethnic, religious and political freedom. Whether or not we have personal freedom, this can only be answered by each person individually.
I pray that the Virgin Mary always intercedes for us. May the Incarnate Christ always abide within us. May our Motherland Greece always have ethnic, religious, political and personal freedoms for its citizens. May we all live free. We should always be thankful to our heroic forebearers who sacrificed themselves in order that we may enjoy our national freedom. May we live reconciled to God. May we have a personal relationship with Him. May we become true human beings, in every sense of the word. May we live and breathe our freedom. May we understand that the basis of every other freedom is our personal freedom.

With fatherly love and fervent prayers,

+ Metropolitan Archbishop Sotirios
Head of the Greek Orthodox Church in Canada

Monday, March 12, 2012

“Ontario is still the number one destination for immigrants” Dalton McGuinty


An exclusive conversation with the Premier of Ontario. 
                                               By Thomas S. Saras
                                               

Dalton McGuinty, is not an ordinary politician. This is something the reader realizes when he thinks that this is the third straight mandate he recently received from the Ontario voters. For a politician of our thought times this is more than on ordinary mandate, it shows the trust of voters to his political skills and his ability to lead.I am quite sure that Dalton McGuinty, with this present mandate he is writing history.
This interview contacted in his office and always the Premier welcomed me with his well-known smile. Taking this opportunity I want to thank him for this honour.  


Q. Premier, these are harsh economic times for the Province and for the people of Ontario.  One might say we are passing through rough waters. What is it that your government has done to provide some sort of security to  Ontarians?

A. We find ourselves at a time in history that is filled with challenge and overflowing with opportunity. Challenge to be found in an uncertain global economy, slow economic growth here in Canada and in Ontario and we have a deficit. A big deficit which makes up the challenge. The opportunity is that we can make some changes as to the way the government works. We can improve the quality of services and introduce new efficiencies so that they become more affordable so that we can guarantee to our children and grandchildren that they will have good quality schools and good quality healthcare, just as you and I are enjoying today.  So there are a few things already to build on our strongest economic advantage. First of all we have said that we remain completely committed to full-day kindergarten. We have known for a long time now, studies have shown that children who get a good start in school are much more likely to finish high school, to go onto college, University or an apprenticeship. In order to get a better paying job, to enjoy a better standard of living and to be able to raise their family in relative comfort. All of that starts in the earliest years of school. This is why we are so committed to full-day kindergarten. At the other end in university and college one of the first things we did as a new government was to go ahead with our new 30% off tuition grant, to make sure that for our middle to low income families they can continue to go on to college and university because this is so important to all of us. If we are going to compete and succeed we have to build on our strengths, those are the skills and education levels of our people.

Moving forward now, we are working very hard to prepare our budget. In that budget we will be making choices. Some things are more important than others. If you and I were to knock on doors, families would tell you that the support and services that we deliver as a government are healthcare and education.  So we have made a commitment to protect healthcare and education. We will say yes to some things and no to other things. For example we are now questioning whether or not we should be spending $345 million every year to support the hoarse racing industry in Ontario. At a time when we have to make choices, if we have to choose between healthcare or hoarse racing or education and hoarse racing, I know where families would want us to make our choice.  So we will continue to be informed by the values that Ontario families have. They want us to be fair. They want everyone who works in the Public Sector to be part of the solution. So we have said to our teachers, for example, we need to you to be part of the solution so we are asking you to accept a wage freeze. We are saying to our doctors they need to accept a wage freeze. We will be saying to all our Public Sector partners we need you to accept a wage freeze. You may have heard Tom, that I announced today that MPP’s are going to freeze their wages for two more years. That is five consecutive years of wage freeze for MPP’s.  It is important that we be seen to be leading by example. So I know that Ontarians are prepared for this challenge. They know we have to make some difficult decisions. They understand that it is all about choices. We are going to work as hard as we can to ensure that we protect healthcare, protect education, find ways to grow the economy and make sure that we are fair.



Q. Mr. Premier, this province used to be the machine that was leading Canada’s economy.  Nowadays we are seeing that some companies are leaving Ontario and returning to the United States. The economy seems like it is going backwards.

A. We are still net beneficiaries. Every year we still gain more people who come here than leave to go to other parts of the country or the world. There is a natural flow of people in and out of the Province of Ontario and this is a good thing. We are not closed off to the world. I will take my own kids for example, I tell my kids, and sure I would love it if you worked in Ontario but if you decide that you want to work someplace else in Canada or the world then all the power to you. Where ever you go though be proud to be an Ontarian, a Canadian. I am okay with that. I was recently in Kitchener/Waterloo and met some young people there from five or six different countries that are coming to Ontario to work here. I was also just in Thunder Bay at another research lab. People there are from the east, from African, Russia, USA the Ukraine, so every year we continue to draw in more and more people who are excited about their future here in Ontario.

The other thing I should tell you Tom is that we are still the number one destination, the number one choice for immigrants who are coming to Canada. Their first choice is Ontario by far. I think we are getting more people coming to Ontario than all the other provinces combined. So we are still a big draw.


Q. The Federal government states that new immigrants who arrive in Canada are choosing to go to other provinces and less are coming to Ontario.

A. We still receive more immigrants arriving in Ontario than all the other provinces put together.  I will have this confirmed (Brad you will confirm this for me). So we are still the number one destination. What we want to do now with the Federal government is that we have created a new “Expert Round Table”. You may have heard something about this. We are asking eminent Ontarians to give us their best advice so that we can together approach the Federal government and say, you know you have a certain relationship you developed with British Columbia and Quebec, and well we want a special relationship here in Ontario too, so that we have more say, more authority over immigration.


Q. Mr. Premier, the day you were with Premier Sauret, you were asking the federal government not to touch the monies that will eventually be given to the Provinces. We also know that the federal government is facing problems in the future and of course they are trying to control their own budget. How do you think they will give money to the provinces and at the same time cut down on their own deficit?

A. Let me tell you what we are doing here in Ontario. We are not going to do what the previous conservative government did. They took some of their responsibilities and downloaded those onto municipalities and the municipalities had to raise their taxes. So this was of no advantage to Ontarians themselves. So we said to the municipalities we will not do this to you. We will find a way to manage our financial affairs in a way that does not hurt other governments. The federal government in the 1990’s, when they attacked their deficit, they did it in a way that hurt provinces. So I am saying to the Harper government, do not do what has been done in the past. Work with us so that together recognize that there is just the one taxpayer, lets find a way to work together to tackle our fiscal challenges and find efficiencies.


Q. Sir, as you stated Ontario is the number one choice for immigrants. Eventually we will be facing the possibility of cutting services. This is one of the things you want to control you cannot continue to spend. The opposition is accusing you of free spending policies. I am asking you what is your government’s plan to help newcomers.

A. First of all I have heard the charge that the Ontario government spends a lot of money. But on a per capita basis Tom, we spend the lowest per person in Canada. All, ten provinces. So we have been using taxpayer dollars very efficiently. We also have the second lowest tax burden in the country. So we are very responsible in terms of the level of taxation we have and how much money we spend. Let’s understand that immigration is really important to us. We are nearly at a point now Tom, that the growth in our labour force is entirely dependant on immigration. If we want to grow this economy we want to make sure that we remain attractive to immigrants and that we have the necessary supports in place to make sure that immigrants become as strong as they can as quickly as possible. That’s why the federal government owes us over $2 million on an outstanding agreement, which they have been refusing to pay us. And that money by the way does not go to our government; it goes to our settlement services. Agencies in the communities who take on responsibility for everything from English as a second language to some basic job training, how people find housing etc… all these kinds of things that is really important to all of us. I am confident that there are ways to find savings in government that does not get in the way of our ability to provide support to new Canadians. Because when they do well it grows our economy.


Q. You referred to our English as a second language program, are you willing to continue them the way they are or are you looking at cutting some of the services?

A. Well, I leave this to the Finance Minister to make decisions about where we what to spend our money. I cannot speak to that specifically, but what I can say again is that making sure we have the necessary supports in place for our newcomers is very important to all of us and we want to make sure that we continue to do this.


Q. Mr. Premier as I walk the streets of our great city, I see many older people begging for money. This is something that I have not seen before. I believe that this shows a problem with our social services. Are you aware of this and if so what is it that you can do?

A. I think Tom, that one of the most exciting opportunities before us and I have not yet talked about this publicly yet, is the transformation of our social supports. I spoke about the Ontario disability support program and Ontario works and a whole bunch of other ones. Now we have asked a couple of people like Francis and Amir Shaikh to give us their very best advice. Don Drummond provided us with some preliminary advice. But I am convinced that if you take a look at all the money to be found in the system, that it is not being used as efficiently as possible and we are not doing enough to help people who find themselves in need of support to given them the necessary training. Overwhelming the people in the social systems are telling us, “I just want a job; I did not choose to go onto Ontario works”. Now for many of those people Tom, they need training. They are not ready to go into the work force right away. So we need, with a small investment, we can given them the necessary skills so that they are much more employable. I am convinced and this is something governments have talked about for at least 20 years and there is a lot of money that is eaten up along the way before it gets in the hands of those who find themselves in need of special supports. So we look forward to receiving this report and that we look forward to taking some assessment steps.

Q. At the same time we have the Drummond report who has asked your government to cut down on support and services. So it seems to be a very complicated situation. How is your government going to overcome this?

A. We will answer that of course in the budge. But one of the things we said for example Tom, is that over half the money that we spend in government it goes into salaries. So now we are saying to our teachers, we have worked well together, very well together as partners and we have better schools today, better education today now I need for you to take a pay freeze. Now we are saying to the doctors that we need you to take pay freeze. We are saying to all our public sector partners, half of the money goes into salaries so we have to freeze our pay and we are leading by example as you know, we have announced a pay freeze making it five years in a row now.

Q. European politicians I believe have gone a bit further than a pay freeze, they have agreed to a pay cut in Italy, France and Germany. But for people who are being paid at a lower salary see that politicians have also cut their pay and would be quite encouraging.
Based on my opinion allow me to ask you the question in case that the American dollar increases in value and our dollar devaluates, does your government worry about a similar situation?


A. Well, if our dollar comes down this is helpful to our manufacturers here in Ontario because it means that when we export our goods they are more affordable. A high dollar makes our goods more expensive for the world to buy. So that would not hurt us. But having said that Tom, we cannot build an economy on a low dollar. We have to build an economy on high skills, high education and high level of productivity. What does this mean? It means that our business need to invest in new technologies and new equipment and in training for the people so that we are working as smart as we can. It is not about working longer hours here in Ontario so that we are more competitive, but it does mean taking advantage of new technologies. The latest thinking with respect to how we manage our business and grow our businesses and make sure the people that we are using are as smart as they can be. So we will do our part to provide good colleges, universities and good apprenticeship opportunities. Even when they get into the work place we are asking employers to keep investing in them, give them some new training opportunities, keep them smart and working at the cutting edge.

Q. Yesterday the Toronto Council decided to ask you not to allow Toronto to get into the European agreement for free-trade. To be honest with you I was surprised to hear a city wants to be excluded from an agreement that nationally will be done with the European Union.

A. Well we are working with the other provinces and the federal government in a cautious and responsible way to see if we could in fact enter into an agreement with the European Union. We think that managed properly there could be considerable opportunities considerable upsides for the people of Ontario. We are not afraid of work. We are confident that on a level playing field we can compete and we can win on the basis of our talent and the basis of our inherent strengths as Ontarians and Canadians. So we will be very careful going down this road to make sure that we are not going to compromise ourselves here. But we are confident at this point in time enter into an agreement which is good for Ontario.


Q. This is your third term as Premier. Previously you were in good standings, but this time for the first time you are facing a minority government and you cannot be in full control of your own problems. How do you feel?

A. First of all, it is a tremendous honour for me to serve again as Premier. It would have been nice to have one more seat, but it was not there for us. It means that there are some differences and you have to look for ways to include the opposition to do things so that they can see some of their policies in government legislation. We have to create more opportunities and reach across the aisle to each other and to work together. A real important question for us to always ask is, what do Ontarians expect of us? I think they expect for us to find some common ground. Maybe not all the time  but certainly frequently, find some common ground and find a way to make progress on their behave. It is not really about the Liberals or the NDP or the Conservatives, it is always about the people of Ontario. And they want us to find a way to make progress for them. I think everyone sees the economic and fiscal challenges and we have different ways of tackling that but the really good news is that we all understand that we need to tackle it.

Mr. Premier, I thank you once again for taking the time for this interview. On behalf of the members of the Ethnic press and our readers allow me to tell you that we always appreciate hearing from you.

Thomas S. Saras, is the President and CEO of the National Ethnic Press and Media Council of Canada and Editor-In-Chief of Patrides, N. American Review.

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Planck steps closer to the cosmic blueprint

13 February 2012
ESA’s Planck mission has revealed that our Galaxy contains previously undiscovered islands of cold gas and a mysterious haze of microwaves. These results give scientists new treasure to mine and take them closer to revealing the blueprint of cosmic structure.
The new results are being presented this week at an international conference in Bologna, Italy, where astronomers from around the world are discussing the mission’s intermediate results. These results include the first map of carbon monoxide to cover the entire sky. Carbon monoxide is a constituent of the cold clouds that populate the Milky Way and other galaxies. Predominantly made of hydrogen molecules, these clouds provide the reservoirs from which stars are born.  


Molecular clouds in the Cepheus region

Molecular clouds in the Cepheus region
However, hydrogen molecules are difficult to detect because they do not readily emit radiation. Carbon monoxide forms under similar conditions and, even though it is much rarer, it emits light more readily and therefore is more easily detectable. So, astronomers use it to trace the clouds of hydrogen. “Planck turns out to be an excellent detector of carbon monoxide across the entire sky,” says Planck collaborator Jonathan Aumont from the Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale, Universite Paris XI, Orsay, France.
Surveys of carbon monoxide undertaken with radio telescopes on the ground are extremely time consuming, hence they are limited to portions of the sky where molecular clouds are already known or expected to exist.
 


All-sky image of molecular gas and three molecular cloud complex
All-sky image of molecular gas and three molecular cloud complexes seen by Planck

“The great advantage of Planck is that it scans the whole sky, allowing us to detect concentrations of molecular gas where we didn’t expect to find them,” says Dr Aumont. Planck has also detected a mysterious haze of microwaves that presently defies explanation.
It comes from the region surrounding the galactic centre and looks like a form of energy called synchrotron emission. This is produced when electrons pass through magnetic fields after having been accelerated by supernova explosions.
The curiosity is that the synchrotron emission associated with the galactic haze exhibits different characteristics from the synchrotron emission seen elsewhere in the Milky Way.
The galactic haze shows what astronomers call a ‘harder’ spectrum: its emission does not decline as rapidly with increasing energies.
 


The mysterious Galactic Haze seen by Planck

The mysterious Galactic Haze seen by Planck
Several explanations have been proposed for this unusual behaviour, including higher supernova rates, galactic winds and even the annihilation of dark-matter particles. So far, none of them has been confirmed and it remains puzzling.
“The results achieved thus far by Planck on the galactic haze and on the carbon monoxide distribution provide us with a fresh view on some interesting processes taking place in our Galaxy,” says Jan Tauber, ESA’s Project Scientist for Planck.
Planck’s primary goal is to observe the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), the relic radiation from the Big Bang, and to measure its encoded information about the constituents of the Universe and the origin of cosmic structure.
 


Galactic Haze seen by Planck and Galactic 'bubbles' seen by Ferm
Galactic Haze seen by Planck and Galactic 'bubbles' seen by Fermi

But it can only be reached once all sources of foreground emission, such as the galactic haze and the carbon monoxide signals, have been identified and removed. “The lengthy and delicate task of foreground removal provides us with prime datasets that are shedding new light on hot topics in galactic and extragalactic astronomy alike,” says Dr Tauber.
“We look forward to characterising all foregrounds and then being able to reveal the CMB in unprecedented detail.”
Planck’s first cosmological dataset is expected to be released in 2013.
Contact for further information
 


All-sky image of molecular gas seen by Planck and previous surve
All-sky image of molecular gas seen by Planck and previous surveys
 

All-sky image of molecular gas seen by Planck
All-sky image of molecular gas seen by Planck
 

Molecular clouds in the Taurus region
Molecular clouds in the Taurus region
 

Molecular clouds in the Pegasus region
Molecular clouds in the Pegasus region
 

ESA's new Vega launcher scores success on maiden flight

13 February 2012
Vega, ESA's new launch vehicle, is ready to operate alongside the Ariane 5 and Soyuz launchers after a successful qualification flight this morning from Europe's Spaceport in Kourou, French Guiana.

With Vega extending the family of launchers available at the spaceport, Europe now covers the full range of launch needs, from small science and Earth observation satellites to the largest missions like ESA's supply freighters to the International Space Station.
The first Vega lifted off at 10:00 GMT (11:00 CET, 07:00 local time) from the new launch pad, and conducted a flawless qualification flight.
Vega's light launch capacity accommodates a wide range of satellites - from 300 kg to 2500 kg - into a wide variety of orbits, from equatorial to Sun-synchronous. Its reference mission is 1500 kg into a 700 km-high circular Sun-synchronous orbit.
Vega will thus add to Europe's set of launch services next to the Ariane 5 heavy-lifter and the Soyuz medium-class launcher already in service.
The combination of these three systems operating from French Guiana will also improve the efficiency of Europe's launch infrastructure by sharing its operating costs over a larger number of launches.
"In a little more than three months, Europe has increased the number of launchers it operates from one to three, widening significantly the range of launch services offered by the European operator Arianespace. There is not anymore one single European satellite which cannot be launched by a European launcher service," said Jean-Jacques Dordain, Director General of ESA.
"It is a great day for ESA, its Member States, in particularly Italy where Vega was born, for European industry and for Arianespace."
Vega launcher development started in 2003. Seven Member States contributed to the programme: Belgium, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland.
"Today is a moment of pride for Europe as well as those around 1000 individuals who have been involved in developing the world's most modern and competitive launcher system for small satellites," said Antonio Fabrizi, ESA's Director of Launchers.
"ESA, with the technical support of the Italian and French space agencies, and about 40 industrial companies coordinated by the prime contractor ELV SpA, have made this enormous challenge a reality in under a decade of development."
More on the flight
All of Vega's three solid-propellant stages performed as planned. The upper stage manoeuvred to reach a circular orbit at an altitude of 1450 km inclined at 69.5º to the equator. There, it released the primary payload, the LARES laser relativity satellite, a 37.6 cm-diameter sphere of tungsten alloy fitted with 92 laser retroreflectors. The mirrors will allow high-precision distance measurements to study a 'frame-dragging' effect predicted by Einstein's theory of relativity.
The upper stage then manoeuvred again to reduce the orbit's lowest point to 350 km, to the correct orbit for release of the ALMASat-1 technology microsatellite and the seven tiny university-sponsored picosatellites.
The upper stage then jettisoned its remaining propellants and shut down.
In order to limit the risk of creating new space debris, Vega's upper stage is in an orbit that ensures reentry in a few years. It will be incinerated during descent, leaving only small pieces to reach the ground.
During the VV01 mission, a large amount of data was collected on Vega's performance, as well as the environment experienced by the payloads.
In the coming weeks, this information will be analysed in depth to confirm the full qualification of the Vega launch system, which will then be handed over to Arianespace for marketing and operations.
New technologies for large solid-propellant motors were demonstrated under flight conditions by the P80FW first stage. As the largest monolithic solid-propellant motor ever flown, it features a composite casing, an advanced nozzle and electromechanical actuators for steering - a world first for a motor of that size.
These technologies will be used on future Vega flights, of course, but they are also available for future launchers being studied by ESA as part of the Next Generation Launcher initiative.
Moving to the next phase
The Vega programme now enters a new phase, called VERTA: the Vega Research, Technology and Accompaniment programme.
Under VERTA, Vega will launch various science and technology missions.
The next flight is scheduled for early 2013 carrying ESA's Proba-V remote sensing satellite and multiple auxiliary payloads.
Other upcoming ESA missions under the VERTA programme are ADM-Aeolus to monitor wind profiles, Lisa Pathfinder to demonstrate technologies for detecting gravity waves, and the Intermediate eXperimental Vehicle (IXV), a demonstrator for advanced reentry technologies.
The first commercial contract for VEGA has already been signed by Arianespace, VEGA's commercial operator and more are under negotiation.
After an open competition, Arianespace was awarded the contract in December 2011 to launch the Sentinel-2B and Sentinel-3B satellites on the Vega launcher, part of ESA's Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES) programme.

ESA astronaut André Kuipers on his way to the International Space Station

21 December 2011
After their launch from Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan at 13:16 GMT (14:16 CET) today, ESA astronaut André Kuipers and crewmates Oleg Kononenko and Don Pettit are circling Earth every 90 minutes aboard the Soyuz TMA-3M spacecraft as they make their way to the International Space Station.

During the next two days, the spacecraft will circle the globe 35 times, performing three major engine burns as its orbit is adjusted for docking with the International Space Station (ISS) on Friday, 23 December at 13:43 GMT (14:43 CET).
With their arrival, the Space Station will resume full operations – the occupancy has been reduced to three for about three months as a result of the Progress cargo vessel launch mishap in August.
During his PromISSe mission – Programme for Research in Orbit Maximising the Inspiration from the Space Station for Europe – André will be part of Expeditions 30 and 31.
As a flight engineer, he will be the prime crewmember responsible for the rendezvous and docking operations of ESA’s third Automated Transfer Vehicle, ATV-3. ATV is the largest servicing vehicle for the Station in operation today.
ATV Edoardo Amaldi will deliver essential cargo, perform regular orbit reboosts and enable the Station to avoid space debris.
André will also be closely involved in berthing the new Dragon (SpaceX) and Cygnus (Orbital Sciences) visiting vehicles, part of NASA’s commercial resupply programme.
More than 25 European experiments will be carried out during André’s mission, covering a range of disciplines: human research, fluid physics, materials science, radiation research, biology and technology.
In addition, André will conduct about 20 experiments for NASA and JAXA, the US and Japanese space agencies.
During his mission, André will have his eyes on our planet, sharing some of the unique views of Earth from the Station’s Cupola window module. He will invite children to become involved in a wide range of educational activities about life, biodiversity and the effects of climate change on Earth.
Science demonstrations will be beamed from orbit to classrooms across Europe, with experiments on convection and creating foams in weightlessness.
André will also be an advocate for health and human wellbeing by encouraging children to stay fit by following the second international education initiative of ‘Mission-X: Train Like an Astronaut’.
The ESA astronaut will remain in space for about five months as part of the Station’s permanent, international six-astronaut crew. He will land back on Earth after 148 days next May.

Saturday, February 11, 2012

PIPES: Kastelorizo: Mediterranean flash point

Turkey could provoke hostilities at nearby Greek island

Wednesday, February 8, 2012
By Daniel Pipes - The Washington Times
That Athens controls this wisp of land implies it could (but does not yet) claim an exclusive economic zone (EEZ) in the Mediterranean Sea extending 200 nautical miles to Kastelorizo. This would reduce the Turkish EEZ to a fraction of what it would be were the island under Ankara's control.
Were Athens to claim its full EEZ, Kastelorizo's presence would make its EEZ contiguous with the EEZ of Cyprus, a factor with great import now, at a moment of massive offshore gas and oil discoveries. Including Kastelorizo in an EEZ would benefit the emerging Greece-Cyprus-Israel alliance by making it possible to transport Cypriot and Israeli natural gas (via pipeline) or electricity (via cable) to Western Europe without Turkish permission. This has taken on special urgency since Nov. 4, when Turkey's minister for energy,Taner Yildiz, announced that his government would not permit Israeli natural gas to transit Turkish territory; Ankara likely also will ban Cypriot exports.
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) colleagues accept Greek control of Kastelorizo and its six nautical miles of territorial waters, but not more, and certainly not its full EEZ rights. Indeed, in their eyes, Greek assertion of an EEZ constitutes a casus belli. By neutering Kastelorizo, Ankara can lay claim to a large economic area in the Mediterranean and block cooperation among its adversaries. This is why the island could become a flash point.
Several developments point to AKP intimidation of Greece over Kastelorizo. First, in September, it authorized a Norwegian ship, the BergenSurveyor, accompanied by other sea craft, to begin prospecting for gas and oil south of Kastelorizo, including some of the island's continental shelf. Second, Turkish warships have trained with live ammunition between Rhodes and Kastelorizo. Finally, Turkish military aircraft overflew Kastelorizo four times in 2011 without permission, sometimes very low with reconnaissance aircraft.
This bellicosity fits a larger pattern. The AKP government, especially since it took full control of the armed forces in late July, has shown increasing hostility toward Cyprus, Israel, Syria and Iraq. In addition, Ankara has long denied Cyprus its EEZ, so doing the same vis-a-vis Kastelorizo builds on an established policy. Indeed, the Turks' brutal, napalm-assisted 1974 conquest of the northern 36 percent of Cyprus set a precedent for seizing nearby island territory. Grabbing Kastelorizo would require about as much time as reading this column.
So far, responses to heightened Turkish aggression in the Mediterranean have focused on deterring Turkish feints toward gas and oil reserves in the Cypriot EEZ, with navies and statements from the United States and Russia backing the Republic of Cyprus' right to exploit its economic resources. Cypriot President Demetris Christofias warned that if Ankara persists with its gunboat diplomacy, "there will be consequences which, for sure, will not be good." Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon told the Greeks, "If anyone tries to challenge these drillings, we will meet those challenges," and his government enhanced security not only for its own maritime fields but also for drilling areas in Cypriot waters. On at least one occasion, Israeli warplanes have confronted Turkish ships.
Such clear signals of resolve are welcome. As the European Union pushes Greece to drill for hydrocarbons to find new sources of income, it should also support Athens in declaring its EEZ, reject AKP troublemaking over Kastelorizo and clearly indicate the dire results for Turkey from any aggression toward an island now happily renowned for its diving and snorkeling.
Daniel Pipes (DanielPipes.org) is president of the Middle East Forum and Taube distinguished visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution of Stanford University.
© Copyright 2012 The Washington Times, LLC.

Thursday, February 9, 2012

The Genocide of the Ottoman Greeks

Studies on the State–Sponsored Campaign of Extermination of the Christians of Asia Minor (1912-1922) and Its Aftermath: History, Law, Memory
Edited by Tessa Hofmann, Matthias Bjørnlund and Vasileios Meichanetsidis 


The recent vote against the denial of the Armenian Genocide held by the French Parliament, and the discussion to recognize the same event by the Israeli Knesset, brings to the fore the issue of the Turkish government’s adverse reaction, reflecting perhaps a deep-seated sense of culpability and apparent unwillingness to accept responsibility for the first genocide of the Twentieth Century, that of the Christians of the Ottoman Empire and the early Turkish Republic.
On February 28, 2012 Aristide D. Caratzas is publishing The Genocide of the Ottoman Greeks, a collective work by nineteen distinguished international scholars, which addresses one of the lesser known aspects of the extermination of the Ottoman Christians, namely that of the Greeks, and provides a number of approaches for the study of this event.
The period of transition from the collapse of the Ottoman Empire to the foundation of the Turkish Republic was characterized by a number of processes largely guided by a narrow elite that aimed to construct a modern, national state. One of these processes was the deliberate and planned elimination, indeed extermination, of the Christian (and certain other) minorities. The numbers are stark: most scholars agree that in 1912 there were about 4-5 million Christians in Asia Minor and Thrace (Greeks, Armenians, Assyrians and others); by 1923 the Christians in the space that became the Turkish Republic were reduced to less than 300,000.
Raphael Lemkin, the legal scholar who introduced the term “genocide” into international law, formulated his early ideas on the definition of this war crime by studying the destruction of the Christians of Asia Minor, while the distinguished (recently deceased) Turcologist Neoklis Sarris has noted that the annihilation of the Christian minorities represented an integral element of the formation of the Turkish Republic.
As the editors of this volume note, the recent resolution by the International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS) recognizing the Greek and Assyrian genocides (December 2007) reinforces the justification for the study in greater depth of the genocide of the Greek Christian population of Asia Minor and Thrace.
The last two decades have seen a massive amount of research of the genocide of the Armenian population in the Ottoman/Turkish space; our publishing house has produced a number of works, most notable of which was the eyewitness testimony of Leslie A. Davis, US Consul in Harput (The Slaughterhouse Province: An American Diplomat's Report on the Armenian Genocide of 1915-1917).
Much less scholarly work has been done on the genocide of the Greeks of Asia Minor and Thrace; there are many reasons for this, including the fact that Turkish governments have been successful in intimidating diplomats in the context of Turkish-Greek relations of the last generation, and of subverting academic integrity by inducing some scholars (including Greeks) to make a career as denialists supported by international NGOs, in the name of countering "nationalism."
The Genocide of the Ottoman Greeks therefore represents an effort to provide an outline and approaches for more extensive study of the deliberate destruction and elimination of a Greek presence that spanned over three millennia in the space that became the Turkish Republic. It includes fifteen article contributions by scholars from Australia, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Israel, the United Kingdom and the United States, and three appendices (A Chronology of Major Events, A Glossary of Terms, and “A Select Bibliography,” the last over forty pages).  
The thematic approaches developed in The Genocide of the Ottoman Greeks include:  A group of eight studies under the section titled “Historical Overview, Documentation, Interpretation;” and two more in a section titled “Representations and Law,” one of which outlines Lemkin’s studies of the Christian genocide based on his personal archive. In addition there are sections titled “Genocide Education,” “Memorialization,” and “Conceptualization,” which include studies exploring, a) an outline syllabus for the teaching of the Greek genocide on the secondary level in the US (in Chicago), b) the erection of monuments in Greece commemorating the loss of life and homelands, c) the role of genocide in the creation of nationality, and d) a critical approach in the use of photographic evidence for the study of the genocide of the Christian peoples in what is now the space occupied by the Turkish Republic.
Publication Information:
Publisher: Aristide D. Caratzas / http://www.caratzas.com
Publication Date: February 28, 2012
Hardcover xii+508 pages, 37 photographs, maps (including a foldout) 
ISBN 978-0-89241-615-8 
Price: US$75.00


Contents:
“Introduction” — Tessa Hofmann, Matthias Bjørnlund and Vasileios Meichanetsidis
“The Integrity and Courage to Recognize All the Victims of a Genocide” — Israel W. Charny
Historical Overview, Documentation, Interpretation
“Γενοκτονία εν Ροή, Cumulative Genocide: The Massacres and Deportations of the Greek Population of the Ottoman Empire (1912-1923)” — Tessa Hofmann
“The 1914 Persecutions of Greeks in the Ottoman Empire and the First Attempt at an Exchange of Minorities between Greece and Turkey” — John Mourelos
“Danish Sources on the Destruction of the Ottoman Greeks, 1914-1916” — Matthias Bjørnlund
“The Role of Teşkilât-ı Mahsusa (Special Organization) in the Genocide of 1915” — Racho Donef
“The Smyrna Holocaust: The Final Phase of the Greek Genocide” — Nikolaos Hlamides
“The Immediate Context of the Smyrna Catastrophe: The Peace Treaties and the Aftermath of the Greco-Turkish War of 1919–1922” — Matthew Stewart
“The American Near East Relief and the Megale Katastrophe in 1922”— Harry J. Psomiades
“International Red Cross: A Mission to Nowhere” — Stavros T. Stavridis
Representations and Law
“Genocide of Others: Raphael Lemkin, the Genocide of the Greeks, the Holocaust, and the Present Moment” — Steven Leonard Jacobs
“The Ottoman Genocide of the Greeks and the Other Christian Minorities in Light of the Genocide Convention” — Alfred de Zayas
Genocide Education, Memorialization, Conceptualization
“Teaching the Greek Genocide” — Ronald Levitsky
“Remembering the Genocide and the ‘Unforgettable Homelands:’ The Erection of
Commemorative Monuments in Greece by the Refugees of Asia Minor — Michel Bruneau
and Kiriakos Papoulidis
“The Eastern Question: Genocide in Support of Nationality” — Akis Kalaitzidis and Donald Wallace
Achieving Ever-Greater Precision in Attestation and Attribution of Genocide Photographs —
Abraham Der Krikorian and Eugene Taylor
Appendices: Chronology of Major EventsGlossary of TermsSelect Bibliography

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...