Thursday, March 15, 2012

Statement by Commissioner for Climate Action Connie Hedegaard following yesterday's Environment Council

''Poland's no to the European Commission low-carbon Roadmap is unfortunate, but it will not stop Europe from moving on with its transition to a low-carbon economy.
The bad news was that Poland blocked Council conclusions for the second time. The good and encouraging news is that Poland was the only country to block. The Presidency and the other 26 member states explicitly asked the Commission to move on, and that is what we will do.
The day before the Council the Polish minister signed off an op-ed saying that EU should only have the 2050 reduction objective. How to achieve it should be up to members states themselves as a matter of "subsidiarity".
Let's imagine that we said the same about the economic crisis, that the EU defined the economic target for 2050 but how to reach it and whether anything happened in the next 38 years would be an exclusive matter for individual member states. Everyone can see that this wouldn’t work. This is also true when it comes to our climate policies.
The EU can't work like this. The EU is a democratic community where negotiations are about give and take to get a good result for all. We can't move forward if the most reluctant one dictates the pace to the rest.
The Commission's job is to take care of the common European interest. As late as last week all EU Heads of States and Government urged us to move forward on the low-carbon transition. This is what we will do. There are already a number of proposals from the Commission paving the way, e.g. the energy efficiency directive that the European Council wants to be adopted already in June and the Commission's budget proposal with an ambitious climate mainstreaming.
Now the Commission will work on further measures needed to reach the cost-efficient milestones that will lead us to a low-carbon future''.

Start of the High Level Accession Dialogue with the government of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

Prime Minister Gruevski
''I am convinced that your future lies within the European family. Together we want to make it sure that real, tangible and visible progress can be achieved on the path towards European integration.
I want to commend Prime Minister Gruevski for his personal commitment to the High Level Accession Dialogue. Your personal engagement, Prime Minister, is precious and a key factor for success. Your initiative to strengthen freedom of expression by decriminalising defamation is a good example. I can assure you that I am committed to supporting your reform efforts. What we are starting today is about comprehensive process, active political dialogue between us and also about inclusive framework for reforms. I stress again that these efforts are aimed to bring benefits to all people of your country.
Today is a new opportunity to focus on a number of priorities that can help the social and economic development of the country. We have identified the rule of law, the reform of public administration, freedom of expression, electoral reform and strengthening the market economy as key elements. By moving closer to European standards in these areas, all communities and all citizens will benefit.
We want to focus on action and we want to agree on what are the key measures to take and how the European Commission can help. We want to work together with you in order to make membership a reality. I look forward to a good start today and to the continuation of our high level dialogue.'' stated Commissioner Füle today in Skopje, on the occasion of the starting of the High Level Accession Dialogue with the government of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.

Vital EIB support of EUR 130 million for energy production in Cyprus

The European Investment Bank provides EUR 130 million to the Electricity Authority of Cyprus for a new production unit to enhance electricity supply in Cyprus.
The finance documentation was signed today in a public ceremony at the Ministry of Finance in Nicosia in the presence of Mr. Kikis Kazamias, Cypriot Minister of Finance. The finance contract was signed for the EIB by Vice-President Plutarchos Sakellaris and for the Electricity Authority of Cyprus by the President of the Board of Directors, Mr. Harris Thrassou.
EIB Vice-President Plutarchos Sakellaris, whose responsibilities include EIB’s lending activities in Cyprus as well as energy issues, said on the occasion in Nicosia today: “In 2011 our aggregate lending in Cyprus totalled EUR 180 million. It was for roads and education. I am delighted to sign today a vital finance contract for energy production at the Vassilikos power plant in Cyprus. This is our sixth loan with the Electricity Authority of Cyprus. Through our long-lasting and good cooperation we were able to provide significant support to the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity in Cyprus. This loan comes in good time to cater to the urgent need for energy production in the country after the explosion at the adjacent Mari Naval Military Base last July.
Mr. Kikis Kazamias
The EIB has supported a number of energy projects in Cyprus, mostly in cooperation with the Electricity Authority of Cyprus. This includes loans totaling EUR 330 million for the upgrading of the electricity transmission and distribution network, and EUR 30 million for a new internal combustion engine power plant at the Dekeleia power station in the district of Larnaca in Cyprus. A further EUR 200 million has gone to the Vassilikos electricity power plant, one of the largest investments undertaken in Cyprus. Both electricity production plants can be retrofitted to natural gas, once this becomes available on Cyprus. Electricity demand in Cyprus is rising and plants of this type provide a rapid response to load changes, which makes them suitable for generation of electricity during peak demand This will help meet demand changes in particular during the summer months, when cooling and electricity needs are highest.

Statement by Environment Commissioner Janez Potočnik on the Ministerial Declaration of the 6th World Water Forum

On the second day of the 6th World Water Forum in Marseille, EU Commissioner for the Environment Janez Potočnik endorsed the Ministerial Declaration on Water on behalf of the European Union, together with ministerial delegations from more than 100 countries.
Commissioner Potočnik explained that the Declaration's main aims – access to safe drinking water and sanitation, available water resources for food security and energy production, integrating policies, cooperation and financing at national and international level to meet the water challenges – are in line with and complementary to EU policies.
He added, "I trust today's Declaration will be used by all parties to convey this message at the Rio +20 Conference, which will be an excellent opportunity to put water on top of national and international agendas. The Declaration supports EU objectives for water, green economy, the implementation of the Rio Conventions, improved governance and international cooperation.
I am pleased to see the focus on integrated river basin management, the need to mainstream water policy objectives into other policy areas, and the importance of taking full account of the interconnected challenges that affect the food, water and energy sectors. The Declaration also underlines the importance of addressing water problems through development cooperation policy, and its support to the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals is especially welcome."
The EU has agreed that water, particularly water efficiency, should be one of the top five priority areas in which clear operational targets with agreed time frames should be addressed at Rio.
The EU is committed to sustainable water management, and to ensuring good quality. Despite good progress over recent decades, the EU still faces considerable problems with water quality and quantity. The Declaration contains messages that will be taken up in the "Blueprint to Safeguard Europe's Water Resources" a strategic document that will put forward policy recommendations for the future EU freshwater policy later this year. The Blueprint will identify current gaps and future priorities, steer water policy development until 2020, using an analysis that integrates economic and climate modelling till 2050.
Also present at the World Water Forum were Development Commissioner Andris Piebalgs, Climate Action Commissioner Connie Hedegaard and International Cooperation, Humanitarian Aid and Crisis Response Commissioner Kristalina Georgieva.

Statement by EU Justice Commissioner Reding on the positive vote by the European Parliament on new EU legislation regarding cross-border successions

EU Justice Commissioner Viviane Reding, the European Commission’s Vice-President, said after the vote in the European Parliament's plenary in Strasbourg:
"The death of a family member is a sad and traumatic event, without additional legal headaches. I therefore welcome today's vote of the European Parliament plenary, which constitutes a major step towards providing legal certainty for thousands of families confronted with international successions. I would like to congratulate in particular rapporteur Kurt Lechner, who worked tirelessly to successfully steer this legislation through the European Parliament. In the interests of the more than 12 million EU citizens potentially affected by the new EU law on international successions, I hope a final agreement between the Parliament and the Council can now be reached as soon as possible. I know that the Danish Presidency is working on a final agreement, and I strongly support their efforts."
Following today's vote in the European Parliament plenary, the new EU legislation (a Regulation) now requires the approval of the Council of the 27 Justice Ministers.
Legislation on cross-border successions
The rules applicable to international successions are highly complex and difficult to predict. Legislation governing jurisdiction and the law applicable vary considerably from one Member State to another. This leads to great legal uncertainty and distress for people who want to plan their succession and their heirs, or who may become embroiled in legal and administrative difficulties on inheriting property in another Member State. For example, if a German citizen with a house in southern France dies, would French or German succession law apply to his property? The new EU Regulation will bring legal certainty to this issue.
There are around 4.5 million successions a year in the EU, of which about 10% have an international dimension. These successions are valued at about €123 billion a year.
On 14 October 2009, the Commission proposed an EU Regulation to simplify the settlement of international successions (see IP/09/1508). Under the new EU Regulation, there would be a single criterion for determining both the jurisdiction of the authorities and the law applicable to a cross-border succession: the deceased's habitual place of residence. People living abroad will, however, be able to opt to have the law of their country of nationality apply to the entirety of their succession.
Today’s vote is an important step towards the introduction of a European Certificate of Succession, which will allow people to prove that they are heirs or administrators of a succession without further formalities throughout the EU. This will represent a considerable improvement from the current situation in which people sometimes have great difficulty exercising their rights. The result will be faster, cheaper procedures.
To help citizens become better informed about these laws, the Council of Notaries of the EU has created a website (www.successions-europe.eu), with the support of the European Commission, in 22 EU languages plus Croatian.
The proposal for an EU Regulation that facilitates international successions is a concrete example of how the EU works towards creating an area of justice that will ease citizens' daily lives, as set out by Vice-President Reding on 20 April 2010 in an Action Plan for 2010-2014 as well as in the EU Citizenship Report 2010 (see IP/10/1390).

Tevatron experiments report latest results in search for Higgs boson

Using different search techniques, Tevatron physicists see hints of Higgs boson sighting consistent with those from LHC

Batavia, Ill. --- New measurements announced today by scientists from the CDF and DZero collaborations at the Department of Energy’s Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory indicate that the elusive Higgs boson may nearly be cornered. After analyzing the full data set from the Tevatron accelerator, which completed its last run in September 2011, the two independent experiments see hints of a Higgs boson.
Physicists from the CDF and DZero collaborations found excesses in their data that might be interpreted as coming from a Higgs boson with a mass in the region of 115 to 135 GeV. In this range, the new result has a probability of being due to a statistical fluctuation at level of significance known among scientists as 2.2 sigma. This new result also excludes the possibility of the Higgs having a mass in the range from 147 to 179 GeV.
Physicists claim evidence of a new particle only if the probability that the data could be due to a statistical fluctuation is less than 1 in 740, or three sigmas. A discovery is claimed only if that probability is less than 1 in 3.5 million, or five sigmas.
This result sits well within the stringent constraints established by earlier direct and indirect measurements made by CERN’s Large Hadron Collider, the Tevatron, and other accelerators, which place the mass of the Higgs boson within the range of 115 to 127 GeV. These findings are also consistent with the December 2011 announcement of excesses seen in that range by LHC experiments, which searched for the Higgs in different decay patterns. None of the hints announced so far from the Tevatron or LHC experiments, however, are strong enough to claim evidence for the Higgs boson.
“The end game is approaching in the hunt for the Higgs boson," said Jim Siegrist, DOE Associate Director of Science for High Energy Physics. “This is an important milestone for the Tevatron experiments, and demonstrates the continuing importance of independent measurements in the quest to understand the building blocks of nature.”
Physicists from the CDF and DZero experiments made the announcement at the annual conference on Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories known as Rencontres de Moriond in Italy. This is the latest result in a decade-long search by teams of physicists at the Tevatron.
“I am thrilled with the pace of progress in the hunt for the Higgs boson. CDF and DZero scientists from around the world have pulled out all the stops to reach this very nice and important contribution to the Higgs boson search,” said Fermilab Director Pier Oddone. “The two collaborations independently combed through hundreds of trillions of proton-antiproton collisions recorded by their experiments to arrive at this exciting result.”
Higgs bosons, if they exist, are short-lived and can decay in many different ways. Just as a vending machine might return the same amount of change using different combinations of coins, the Higgs can decay into different combinations of particles. Discovering the Higgs boson relies on observing a statistically significant excess of the particles into which the Higgs decays and those particles must have corresponding kinematic properties that allow for the mass of the Higgs to be reconstructed.
“There is still much work ahead before the scientific community can say for sure whether the Higgs boson exists,” said Dmitri Denisov, DZero co-spokesperson and physicist at Fermilab. “Based on these exciting hints, we are working as quickly as possible to further improve our analysis methods and squeeze the last ounce out of Tevatron data.”
Only high-energy particle colliders such as the Tevatron and LHC can recreate the energy conditions found in the universe shortly after the Big Bang. According to the Standard Model, the theory that explains and predicts how nature’s building blocks behave and interact with each other, the Higgs boson gives mass to other particles.
“Without something like the Higgs boson giving fundamental particles mass, the whole world around us would be very different from what we see today,” said Giovanni Punzi, CDF co-spokesperson and physicist at the National Institute of Nuclear Physics, or INFN, in Pisa, Italy. “Physicists have known for a long time that the Higgs or something like it must exist, and we are eager to finally pin this phenomenon down and start learning more about it.”
If a Higgs boson is created in a high-energy particle collision, it immediately decays into lighter more stable particles before even the world’s best detectors and fastest computers can snap a picture of it. To find the Higgs boson, physicists retraced the path of these secondary particles and ruled out processes that mimic its signal.
The experiments at the Tevatron and the LHC offer a complementary search strategy for the Higgs boson. The Tevatron was a proton/anti-proton collider, with a maximum center of mass energy of 2 TeV, whereas the LHC is a proton/proton collider that will ultimately reach 14 TeV. Because the two accelerators collide different pairs of particles at different energies and produce different types of backgrounds, the search strategies are different. At the Tevatron, for example, the most powerful method is to search the CDF and DZero datasets to look for a Higgs boson that decays into a pair of bottom quarks if the Higgs boson mass is approximately 115-130 GeV.  It is crucial to observe the Higgs boson in several types of decay modes because the Standard Model predicts different branching ratios for different decay modes. If these ratios are observed, then this is experimental confirmation of both the Standard Model and the Higgs.
“The search for the Higgs boson by the Tevatron and LHC experiments is like two people taking a picture of a park from different vantage points,” said Gregorio Bernardi, DZero co-spokesperson at the Nuclear Physics Laboratory of the High Energies, or LPNHE, in Paris . “One picture may show a child that is blocked from the other’s view by a tree. Both pictures may show the child but only one can resolve the child’s features. You need to combine both viewpoints to get a true picture of who is in the park. At this point both pictures are fuzzy and we think maybe they show someone in the park. Eventually the LHC with future data samples will be able to give us a sharp picture of what is there. The Tevatron by further improving its analyses will also sharpen the picture which is emerging today.”
This new updated analysis uses 10 inverse femtobarns of data from both CDF and DZero, the full data set collected from 10 years of the Tevatron’s collider program. Ten inverse femtobarns of data represents about 500 trillion proton-antiproton collisions. Data analysis will continue at both experiments.
“This result represents years of work from hundreds of scientists around the world,” said Rob Roser, CDF co-spokesperson and physicist at Fermilab. “But we are not done yet – together with our LHC colleagues, we expect 2012 to be the year we know whether the Higgs exists or not, and assuming it is discovered, we will have first indications that it behaves as predicted by the Standard Model.”

Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Freedom then and now March 25th Encyclical By Metropolitan Sotirios


It is a fact accepted by all that a more precious thing than freedom does not exist. A person who is not free suffers. He is oppressed. He is not even considered a human being by those who oppress him.
For which freedom do we speak of? First and foremost, we speak of personal freedom. Of course, we also speak of ethnic freedom. Of religious freedom. Of political freedom.
The person who is truly free is the one who is master of himself. He governs himself and is not controlled by his passions. Whoever is master of himself enjoys all the other victories that come with it.
Ethnic freedom is fundamental. This came to the forefront recently, and not from the beginning. This became a fact when the nations were established.
Religious freedom also became a necessity later on. This took place when religions were founded. When humanity lost faith in God and created these religions When man lost his personal relationship with God.
Political freedom is of utmost importance. You have ethnic freedom; that is, a country has its freedom. But in some cases, you are not free within the political system of one’s country – in other words, the political freedom of the citizen. The nation is not enslaved to other countries, but the citizen is enslaved to the dictator or to the bad ruler.
Man had true freedom when he was created by the hands of the Creator. Unfortunately, he relinquished his freedom for material nourishment. He became a slave to himself. To his passions.
It is a great wonder, but man only has true freedom when he follows the will of God. God has no need of this for Himself. Yet, whenever He thinks of man, He deals with him as a Father for His children, always thinking what is best for them.
With the fall of man, humanity became a slave to himself; to his passions; to his sins. He could not be freed by himself. The Creator came in the Person of Christ. The Only-Begotten Son of God became a man. He took on human flesh to free man. On this day of the Annunciation, the Archangel Gabriel revealed the Will of God the Most-Holy Theotokos and Ever-Virgin Mary. God became man. Christ sacrificed Himself for humanity. He gave humanity its freedom once again. He opened wide the doors of Paradise. From then on, man was able to gain access to Paradise through the proper use of his freedom and could then become a citizen of Paradise forever.
This is what God awaits from us. This will only become a reality, however, if man uses his freedom correctly. If he does not become enslaved to his passions. If, during the course of his life, he does not lose his personal relationship and contact with God.
March 25th, 1821 is a landmark for our national freedom. We lost it on May 29, 1453. We lost it because malevolent people were jealous of us and fought us in war. The enemies were many, two being the most prominent: the Crusaders and the Ottomans. We ourselves were not without blame.
We gained our national freedom during the Revolution of 1821; with the true sacrifices of our forebearers during that time; with the return of our forebearers to true freedom, to the personal relationship with God Himself. They fought and sacrificed themselves for the holy faith of Christ and for the freedom of their Motherland.
Greece today has ethnic freedom. Yet, does every Greek (wherever he or she may be in the world) have religious freedom, political freedom and personal freedom?
            The financial crisis in our homeland Greece proves that the Greek has lost his political, religious and personal freedoms. The experience will become a lesson. When every Greek acquires his personal freedom (that is, freedom from his passions), when all Greeks have their personal freedom, then Greece as a whole will enjoy its freedom and its prosperity.
Let us not try to put all the blame on others. Of course, enemies exist. They not only exist, but they also lurk around us. They lurk around us to see us lose our personal freedom, so they may seize away from us every freedom. The greatest responsibility, though, is borne by us. And when we have our national freedom and we waste it away, we bear all the responsibility.
As we celebrate March 25th this year as a religious and national holiday, I call upon all of us to mend our ways; to clearly understand the blessings of freedom that I mentioned above; to compare the freedom that we had when we were not slaves to our passions - the freedom and the joy we had before we lost our national freedom. Let us celebrate, because we have our national freedom. Let us be vigilant to retain our religious freedom, our political freedom, our personal freedom and may we never lose our ethnic freedom.
We who live in Canada have ethnic, religious and political freedom. Whether or not we have personal freedom, this can only be answered by each person individually.
I pray that the Virgin Mary always intercedes for us. May the Incarnate Christ always abide within us. May our Motherland Greece always have ethnic, religious, political and personal freedoms for its citizens. May we all live free. We should always be thankful to our heroic forebearers who sacrificed themselves in order that we may enjoy our national freedom. May we live reconciled to God. May we have a personal relationship with Him. May we become true human beings, in every sense of the word. May we live and breathe our freedom. May we understand that the basis of every other freedom is our personal freedom.

With fatherly love and fervent prayers,

+ Metropolitan Archbishop Sotirios
Head of the Greek Orthodox Church in Canada

Monday, March 12, 2012

“Ontario is still the number one destination for immigrants” Dalton McGuinty


An exclusive conversation with the Premier of Ontario. 
                                               By Thomas S. Saras
                                               

Dalton McGuinty, is not an ordinary politician. This is something the reader realizes when he thinks that this is the third straight mandate he recently received from the Ontario voters. For a politician of our thought times this is more than on ordinary mandate, it shows the trust of voters to his political skills and his ability to lead.I am quite sure that Dalton McGuinty, with this present mandate he is writing history.
This interview contacted in his office and always the Premier welcomed me with his well-known smile. Taking this opportunity I want to thank him for this honour.  


Q. Premier, these are harsh economic times for the Province and for the people of Ontario.  One might say we are passing through rough waters. What is it that your government has done to provide some sort of security to  Ontarians?

A. We find ourselves at a time in history that is filled with challenge and overflowing with opportunity. Challenge to be found in an uncertain global economy, slow economic growth here in Canada and in Ontario and we have a deficit. A big deficit which makes up the challenge. The opportunity is that we can make some changes as to the way the government works. We can improve the quality of services and introduce new efficiencies so that they become more affordable so that we can guarantee to our children and grandchildren that they will have good quality schools and good quality healthcare, just as you and I are enjoying today.  So there are a few things already to build on our strongest economic advantage. First of all we have said that we remain completely committed to full-day kindergarten. We have known for a long time now, studies have shown that children who get a good start in school are much more likely to finish high school, to go onto college, University or an apprenticeship. In order to get a better paying job, to enjoy a better standard of living and to be able to raise their family in relative comfort. All of that starts in the earliest years of school. This is why we are so committed to full-day kindergarten. At the other end in university and college one of the first things we did as a new government was to go ahead with our new 30% off tuition grant, to make sure that for our middle to low income families they can continue to go on to college and university because this is so important to all of us. If we are going to compete and succeed we have to build on our strengths, those are the skills and education levels of our people.

Moving forward now, we are working very hard to prepare our budget. In that budget we will be making choices. Some things are more important than others. If you and I were to knock on doors, families would tell you that the support and services that we deliver as a government are healthcare and education.  So we have made a commitment to protect healthcare and education. We will say yes to some things and no to other things. For example we are now questioning whether or not we should be spending $345 million every year to support the hoarse racing industry in Ontario. At a time when we have to make choices, if we have to choose between healthcare or hoarse racing or education and hoarse racing, I know where families would want us to make our choice.  So we will continue to be informed by the values that Ontario families have. They want us to be fair. They want everyone who works in the Public Sector to be part of the solution. So we have said to our teachers, for example, we need to you to be part of the solution so we are asking you to accept a wage freeze. We are saying to our doctors they need to accept a wage freeze. We will be saying to all our Public Sector partners we need you to accept a wage freeze. You may have heard Tom, that I announced today that MPP’s are going to freeze their wages for two more years. That is five consecutive years of wage freeze for MPP’s.  It is important that we be seen to be leading by example. So I know that Ontarians are prepared for this challenge. They know we have to make some difficult decisions. They understand that it is all about choices. We are going to work as hard as we can to ensure that we protect healthcare, protect education, find ways to grow the economy and make sure that we are fair.



Q. Mr. Premier, this province used to be the machine that was leading Canada’s economy.  Nowadays we are seeing that some companies are leaving Ontario and returning to the United States. The economy seems like it is going backwards.

A. We are still net beneficiaries. Every year we still gain more people who come here than leave to go to other parts of the country or the world. There is a natural flow of people in and out of the Province of Ontario and this is a good thing. We are not closed off to the world. I will take my own kids for example, I tell my kids, and sure I would love it if you worked in Ontario but if you decide that you want to work someplace else in Canada or the world then all the power to you. Where ever you go though be proud to be an Ontarian, a Canadian. I am okay with that. I was recently in Kitchener/Waterloo and met some young people there from five or six different countries that are coming to Ontario to work here. I was also just in Thunder Bay at another research lab. People there are from the east, from African, Russia, USA the Ukraine, so every year we continue to draw in more and more people who are excited about their future here in Ontario.

The other thing I should tell you Tom is that we are still the number one destination, the number one choice for immigrants who are coming to Canada. Their first choice is Ontario by far. I think we are getting more people coming to Ontario than all the other provinces combined. So we are still a big draw.


Q. The Federal government states that new immigrants who arrive in Canada are choosing to go to other provinces and less are coming to Ontario.

A. We still receive more immigrants arriving in Ontario than all the other provinces put together.  I will have this confirmed (Brad you will confirm this for me). So we are still the number one destination. What we want to do now with the Federal government is that we have created a new “Expert Round Table”. You may have heard something about this. We are asking eminent Ontarians to give us their best advice so that we can together approach the Federal government and say, you know you have a certain relationship you developed with British Columbia and Quebec, and well we want a special relationship here in Ontario too, so that we have more say, more authority over immigration.


Q. Mr. Premier, the day you were with Premier Sauret, you were asking the federal government not to touch the monies that will eventually be given to the Provinces. We also know that the federal government is facing problems in the future and of course they are trying to control their own budget. How do you think they will give money to the provinces and at the same time cut down on their own deficit?

A. Let me tell you what we are doing here in Ontario. We are not going to do what the previous conservative government did. They took some of their responsibilities and downloaded those onto municipalities and the municipalities had to raise their taxes. So this was of no advantage to Ontarians themselves. So we said to the municipalities we will not do this to you. We will find a way to manage our financial affairs in a way that does not hurt other governments. The federal government in the 1990’s, when they attacked their deficit, they did it in a way that hurt provinces. So I am saying to the Harper government, do not do what has been done in the past. Work with us so that together recognize that there is just the one taxpayer, lets find a way to work together to tackle our fiscal challenges and find efficiencies.


Q. Sir, as you stated Ontario is the number one choice for immigrants. Eventually we will be facing the possibility of cutting services. This is one of the things you want to control you cannot continue to spend. The opposition is accusing you of free spending policies. I am asking you what is your government’s plan to help newcomers.

A. First of all I have heard the charge that the Ontario government spends a lot of money. But on a per capita basis Tom, we spend the lowest per person in Canada. All, ten provinces. So we have been using taxpayer dollars very efficiently. We also have the second lowest tax burden in the country. So we are very responsible in terms of the level of taxation we have and how much money we spend. Let’s understand that immigration is really important to us. We are nearly at a point now Tom, that the growth in our labour force is entirely dependant on immigration. If we want to grow this economy we want to make sure that we remain attractive to immigrants and that we have the necessary supports in place to make sure that immigrants become as strong as they can as quickly as possible. That’s why the federal government owes us over $2 million on an outstanding agreement, which they have been refusing to pay us. And that money by the way does not go to our government; it goes to our settlement services. Agencies in the communities who take on responsibility for everything from English as a second language to some basic job training, how people find housing etc… all these kinds of things that is really important to all of us. I am confident that there are ways to find savings in government that does not get in the way of our ability to provide support to new Canadians. Because when they do well it grows our economy.


Q. You referred to our English as a second language program, are you willing to continue them the way they are or are you looking at cutting some of the services?

A. Well, I leave this to the Finance Minister to make decisions about where we what to spend our money. I cannot speak to that specifically, but what I can say again is that making sure we have the necessary supports in place for our newcomers is very important to all of us and we want to make sure that we continue to do this.


Q. Mr. Premier as I walk the streets of our great city, I see many older people begging for money. This is something that I have not seen before. I believe that this shows a problem with our social services. Are you aware of this and if so what is it that you can do?

A. I think Tom, that one of the most exciting opportunities before us and I have not yet talked about this publicly yet, is the transformation of our social supports. I spoke about the Ontario disability support program and Ontario works and a whole bunch of other ones. Now we have asked a couple of people like Francis and Amir Shaikh to give us their very best advice. Don Drummond provided us with some preliminary advice. But I am convinced that if you take a look at all the money to be found in the system, that it is not being used as efficiently as possible and we are not doing enough to help people who find themselves in need of support to given them the necessary training. Overwhelming the people in the social systems are telling us, “I just want a job; I did not choose to go onto Ontario works”. Now for many of those people Tom, they need training. They are not ready to go into the work force right away. So we need, with a small investment, we can given them the necessary skills so that they are much more employable. I am convinced and this is something governments have talked about for at least 20 years and there is a lot of money that is eaten up along the way before it gets in the hands of those who find themselves in need of special supports. So we look forward to receiving this report and that we look forward to taking some assessment steps.

Q. At the same time we have the Drummond report who has asked your government to cut down on support and services. So it seems to be a very complicated situation. How is your government going to overcome this?

A. We will answer that of course in the budge. But one of the things we said for example Tom, is that over half the money that we spend in government it goes into salaries. So now we are saying to our teachers, we have worked well together, very well together as partners and we have better schools today, better education today now I need for you to take a pay freeze. Now we are saying to the doctors that we need you to take pay freeze. We are saying to all our public sector partners, half of the money goes into salaries so we have to freeze our pay and we are leading by example as you know, we have announced a pay freeze making it five years in a row now.

Q. European politicians I believe have gone a bit further than a pay freeze, they have agreed to a pay cut in Italy, France and Germany. But for people who are being paid at a lower salary see that politicians have also cut their pay and would be quite encouraging.
Based on my opinion allow me to ask you the question in case that the American dollar increases in value and our dollar devaluates, does your government worry about a similar situation?


A. Well, if our dollar comes down this is helpful to our manufacturers here in Ontario because it means that when we export our goods they are more affordable. A high dollar makes our goods more expensive for the world to buy. So that would not hurt us. But having said that Tom, we cannot build an economy on a low dollar. We have to build an economy on high skills, high education and high level of productivity. What does this mean? It means that our business need to invest in new technologies and new equipment and in training for the people so that we are working as smart as we can. It is not about working longer hours here in Ontario so that we are more competitive, but it does mean taking advantage of new technologies. The latest thinking with respect to how we manage our business and grow our businesses and make sure the people that we are using are as smart as they can be. So we will do our part to provide good colleges, universities and good apprenticeship opportunities. Even when they get into the work place we are asking employers to keep investing in them, give them some new training opportunities, keep them smart and working at the cutting edge.

Q. Yesterday the Toronto Council decided to ask you not to allow Toronto to get into the European agreement for free-trade. To be honest with you I was surprised to hear a city wants to be excluded from an agreement that nationally will be done with the European Union.

A. Well we are working with the other provinces and the federal government in a cautious and responsible way to see if we could in fact enter into an agreement with the European Union. We think that managed properly there could be considerable opportunities considerable upsides for the people of Ontario. We are not afraid of work. We are confident that on a level playing field we can compete and we can win on the basis of our talent and the basis of our inherent strengths as Ontarians and Canadians. So we will be very careful going down this road to make sure that we are not going to compromise ourselves here. But we are confident at this point in time enter into an agreement which is good for Ontario.


Q. This is your third term as Premier. Previously you were in good standings, but this time for the first time you are facing a minority government and you cannot be in full control of your own problems. How do you feel?

A. First of all, it is a tremendous honour for me to serve again as Premier. It would have been nice to have one more seat, but it was not there for us. It means that there are some differences and you have to look for ways to include the opposition to do things so that they can see some of their policies in government legislation. We have to create more opportunities and reach across the aisle to each other and to work together. A real important question for us to always ask is, what do Ontarians expect of us? I think they expect for us to find some common ground. Maybe not all the time  but certainly frequently, find some common ground and find a way to make progress on their behave. It is not really about the Liberals or the NDP or the Conservatives, it is always about the people of Ontario. And they want us to find a way to make progress for them. I think everyone sees the economic and fiscal challenges and we have different ways of tackling that but the really good news is that we all understand that we need to tackle it.

Mr. Premier, I thank you once again for taking the time for this interview. On behalf of the members of the Ethnic press and our readers allow me to tell you that we always appreciate hearing from you.

Thomas S. Saras, is the President and CEO of the National Ethnic Press and Media Council of Canada and Editor-In-Chief of Patrides, N. American Review.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...